dc.description.abstract | The study aimed at evaluating the effect of tillage practice on vegetative growth and yield of
maize and was guided by the following objectives; to evaluate the effect of tillage practice on
vegetative growth of maize, evaluate the effect of tillage practice on nutrient deficiency symptom
expression in maize and evaluate the effect of tillage practice on maize yield.The experiment was
conducted at the Agricultural Research and Development institute in Ngetta Sub County, Lira
District and another one in Njeru Sub county, Buikwe district. Maize varieties Longe 10H and
Longe5 were used in this experiment. The experiment was arranged in a 2X2 factorial design
with 2 tillage practices (conventional tillage and minimum tillage) as the main factors and 2
maize varieties (Longe 10H and Longe 5) as the levels.
The results showed that there was significant difference in plant height, stem girth and leaf width
between the two tillage methods. Minimum tillage had the highest plant height (84.05cm) while
conventional tillage had 79.99 cm,there was a significant difference in stem girth between the
two tillage practices 4.44cm for conventional tillage and 4.2 for minimum tillage. There was no
significant difference in leaf width and number of leaves between the two tillage practices.
At harvest, there was no significant difference in shelling percentage, grain moisture content,
yield and 100 seed weight. However the experiment showed that there was significant difference
in yield between the two varieties used (Longe 5 and Longe 10H). The results suggested that
tillage method did not significantly affect grain yield of maize.
Although there was no significant difference in yield between the two tillage methods
used,conventional tillage practice resulted in higher maize grain yield (7.7 mt/ha) compared to
minimum tillage (7.1 mt/ha). Despite both tillage practices not being profitable, farmers who
adopt minimum tillage as a farming practice will have a lower cost of production and therefore
will incur much lower losses. | en_US |