| dc.description.abstract | The research assessed Local Council Courts Administration of Justice and set out to
answer three specific issues: LC Courts‟ knowledge and understanding of roles and
responsibilities, challenges faced by LC courts in administration of justice and barriers to access
justice in the LC Courts.
The research was conducted in Pabbo Sub County found in Amuru District. The study
used both qualitative and quantitative methods for data collection. Data was collected from 138
respondents through interviews by use of open ended questionnaires, Focus group discussions
and key informant interviews. The use of both manual and computer packages (SPSS) were used
to analyse the findings.
Research findings revealed that access to justice in the Local Council Courts is
influenced by a number of factors and that LC Courts face a number of hurdles in their attempts
to dispense justice. One of the critical challenges to access to justice in the Local Council Courts
is the lack of funding for the courts that has exposed it to accusations of corruption and
acceptance of gifts and facilitation that erode their impartiality.
Most courts were using witnesses as a voting panel, and were awarding the case to the
person who could bring the most witnesses or for whom the audience voted. It is not easy for a
local court to judge against the powerful. Delaying tactics are also common and this, in essence,
undermines expeditious decision-making.
The possibility of winning in the LC Courts means little, since the judgements of the Sub
County Court are just as easily ignored by the other party. Going to the Magistrate‟s Court also
involves re-hearing the case, since LC courts have no known idea for applying to this Court for
enforcement of a judgement that was never appealed. Winning at the Magistrates‟ court has the
possibility of getting enforcement, but court orders and bailiffs cost hundreds of thousands of
shillings which must be paid up front by the winner and at the same time one has to know the
procedure.
The research offered some key recommendations that the problems of access to justice in
the LC Courts are structural and far too widespread to be addressed through ad hoc response to
symptoms or individual cases. The more important issues to address are the system problems of
motivation, supervision and management, funding, and structural problems in the justice system
itself, which allows „forum shopping‟ and makes enforcement almost impossible.
A sense of justice therefore, has to be present and is by and large achievable, provided the
appropriate mechanisms are put in place. | en_US |
