<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/212">
<title>Master of Science in Health Service Management (Dissertations)</title>
<link>http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/212</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1860"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1606"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1579"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T21:24:08Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1860">
<title>Factors associated with neonatal outcome of referred neonates from lower-level health facilities to Jinja Regional Referral Hospital</title>
<link>http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1860</link>
<description>Factors associated with neonatal outcome of referred neonates from lower-level health facilities to Jinja Regional Referral Hospital
Ssemwanga, Steven Loudel
Background: Neonatal mortality is a key public health concern. The neonatal mortality rate &#13;
currently stands at approximately 18 deaths per 1,000 live births, translating into millions of &#13;
deaths annually. Almost half of all neonatal deaths occur in the first day of life, largely from &#13;
preventable causes such as infection, asphyxia, and complications of prematurity. Despite &#13;
efforts to improve neonatal care, outcomes remain suboptimal, particularly for neonates &#13;
referred from lower-level facilities to regional hospitals. Late referrals, inadequate pre-referral &#13;
stabilization, and resource constraints contribute to high mortality rates &#13;
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the factors associated with neonatal outcomes &#13;
among referred neonates at Jinja Regional Referral Hospital. &#13;
Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study design employing documentary review of referred &#13;
neonates at Jinja Regional Referral Hospital. A structured data extraction tool was used to &#13;
collect data from neonatal records of all the referred neonates admitted to JRRH’s Neonatal &#13;
Unit were reviewed between December 2024 and December 2023. The collected data were &#13;
coded, entered into Excel spreadsheet, and analyzed using STATA 14. Data was presented in &#13;
form of text, tables and graphs. Ethical approval and permission to access records obtained &#13;
from JRRH management was obtained. Logistic regression was used to test for association &#13;
while an prevalence ratio was as the measure of the association between the two variables and &#13;
data was presented in term so text, table and pie-charts.     &#13;
Results: A total of 87 referred neonates admitted to JRRH’s Neonatal Unit were reviewed &#13;
between December 2024 and December 2023 community members. From the study, the &#13;
survival of referred neonates admitted to JRRH’s Neonatal Unit was at 63.2%. The most &#13;
common primary reason for referral was prematurity, accounting for 35.6% of cases. Survival &#13;
of the referred neonates admitted to JRRH’s Neonatal Unit was significantly associated with &#13;
being referred from health facilities located within 10 km ((APR: 1.380; 95% CI: 1.076-1.584; &#13;
p = 0.029), staying in the hospital for three days or less (APR: 1.240; 95% CI: 1.083–1.837; p &#13;
= 0.024) and having not develop complications during hospitalization (APR: 1.202; 95% CI: &#13;
1.064-1.927; p = 0.034).    &#13;
Conclusion: The study found that survival was low. Therefore, it is recommended that the &#13;
Ministry of Health should enhance neonatal referral systems, especially for facilities located &#13;
more than 10 km from the referral hospital and prioritize equipping lower-level health facilities &#13;
with basic neonatal care infrastructure and skilled personnel
Lwenge Mathias
</description>
<dc:date>2025-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1606">
<title>Evaluate the implementation process and effect of performance based financing in the health centers of Jinja diocese: case study centers of Jinja diocese</title>
<link>http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1606</link>
<description>Evaluate the implementation process and effect of performance based financing in the health centers of Jinja diocese: case study centers of Jinja diocese
Buuka, Godfrey Zziwa
Most of the low and medium income countries are far below their targets as regards the health &#13;
related Millennium Development Goal and it will be impossible for them to meet their targets by &#13;
2015 (World Bank 2008, WHO 2010). In 2005, a concept of universal access to health for all by &#13;
2025 was coined by WHO member countries (WHO 2005). This desire for attainment of &#13;
universal health for all has led to an increased financial support to the developing countries,&#13;
unfortunately their health care indicators remain poor and their performance does not match with &#13;
the amount of resources they have received. WHO has asked all stakeholders to look out for &#13;
ways in which they can stimulate improved performance in health with a view of reaching more &#13;
people with acceptable quality services (WHO 2010).&#13;
Performance Based Financing (PBF) has slowly gained ground as one of the provider payment &#13;
mechanisms that can address the inefficiencies in health. It is being implemented in several &#13;
countries and experience about its effect on healthcare delivery is building up. A pilot PBF &#13;
project is being implemented in the health centers of Jinja diocese. However, there is no &#13;
information about its implementation and what effects it can have on healthcare service delivery &#13;
in Jinja diocese. Therefore this study was intended to evaluate the implementation process of the &#13;
PBF project, its effect on the performance of health centers as well as the benefits and challenges &#13;
faced during the implementation.&#13;
It was a comparative, descriptive cross sectional study. The study involved interviewing key &#13;
respondents about the implementation process, the benefits and challenges they were &#13;
experiencing in the process. Performance data was also collected from the health centers for 2 &#13;
vi&#13;
years before and 2 years following PBF introduction. Same data was collected for the same &#13;
period of time from public health centers that are not involved in PBF. Comparison was then &#13;
made so as to assess the possible effect of PBF on the performance of the H/Cs. &#13;
The finding showed that the parallel model of PBF implementation was used within the thin &#13;
structures in the diocese. There was no creation of new institutional entities that have been &#13;
accepted as being necessary for the success of PBF.&#13;
The study noted a positive trend in performance in most of the health centers implementing PBF &#13;
in comparison with the public health centers but it was very difficult to truly attribute this &#13;
observation to PBF especially in the absence of the basic institutions to support the &#13;
implementation process.&#13;
Some of the benefits the study noted included improved attention to recording and timely &#13;
submission of facility reports, patient centered facility planning, lowering and flattening of user &#13;
fee in order to attract more patients to come for the services. While challenges included; &#13;
understaffing, rising cost of supplies in a wake of desire for the H/Cs to lower user fees, difficult &#13;
performance targets to attain among others.&#13;
It was therefore concluded that despite the observed increase in performance of the H/Cs, there is &#13;
need to streamline the implementation process by creating autonomous entities of local fund &#13;
holder/steering committee, regulator and verifier. This will give credibility to the process &#13;
especially when there is a desire to scale up the approach from a small pilot project to a wider &#13;
coverage involving even the public health sector.
Anguyo Robert; Anguyo Robert
</description>
<dc:date>2011-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586">
<title>Determinants of health institutional delivery among mothers attending immunization services in Busia district a cross- sectional study</title>
<link>http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1586</link>
<description>Determinants of health institutional delivery among mothers attending immunization services in Busia district a cross- sectional study
Ojok, Ritara Vincent
Both maternal and neonatal health outcomes improve when skilled personnel &#13;
provide delivery services within health facilities. Determinants of delivery location are crucial to &#13;
promoting health facility deliveries and yet health facility delivery rates remain low in most low- &#13;
and middle- income countries. It is asserted that there is expert consensus that delivery at a &#13;
health facility substantially reduces the risk of maternal death. They argued that by increasing &#13;
the use of antenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC) and family planning, the risk of maternal &#13;
death can be further reduced. Several factors influence the location where women deliver from. &#13;
Such factors include place of residence, family decision-making regarding place of delivery, &#13;
ANC attendance, socioeconomic status (SES), trimester of pregnancy, age of woman, parity, &#13;
transport, placenta disposal, delivery position, complication at last delivery, age of pregnancy, &#13;
levels of education of the woman and her partner, and valid health insurance. All these tend to &#13;
be closely related to the context. In eastern region of Uganda, examining such factors could help &#13;
in improving institutional deliveries.  &#13;
The main objective of this study was to ascertain the determinants of institutional &#13;
health facility delivery among mothers attending immunization services in Busia district. &#13;
Methodology: A cross-sectional analytical design, both qualitative and quantitative was used. A &#13;
sample of 385respondent mothers were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaire. Two &#13;
focus group discussions (FGDs) each composed of 8 to 12 members were held with mothers. &#13;
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.  Ethical considerations in research, obtaining letter &#13;
of introduction for data collection, clearance from university, and quality controls were well &#13;
taken care of. &#13;
The level of institution health facility delivery was good, mothers attending &#13;
immunization services (post-natal visits)) were asked to state whether or not they deliver in &#13;
health facility, up to 318( 82.6%) delivered in health facilities, with most of the mothers &#13;
delivering from government hospitals (50.9%) followed by private hospitals (14.3%). The study &#13;
found that place of residence of the mothers was associated with health facility delivery (X2&#13;
 (1) =1.515, p&lt;0.002). Mothers who lived in urban settings were 2.7times more likely to deliver from &#13;
health facilities than mothers who lived in rural settings [COR=2.686, 95% CI (0.394-1.194)]. &#13;
Husband’s educational level was found to be a determinant of health facility delivery (X2&#13;
 (3) =2.054, p&lt;0.006). In comparison with mothers whose husbands had no education, mothers &#13;
whose husbands had primary education, secondary education and tertiary education were &#13;
2.2times (COR=2.249, 95% CI(0.581-8.698)), 1.5times (COR=1.546, 95% CI(0.537-4.453)) and &#13;
1.3times (COR=1.329, 95% CI (0.501-3.523)) more likely to deliver from health facility &#13;
respectively. &#13;
History of having ever delivered from a health facility was associated with the recent health &#13;
facility delivery (X2  (1) = 0.076, p&lt;0.007). Similarly, getting partner support for health facility &#13;
delivery was a determinant for health facility delivery (p&lt;0.003).
Nanying Miisa; Nanying Miisa
</description>
<dc:date>2020-11-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1579">
<title>Performance accountability, evaluation of performance by health care providers in Bugisu region</title>
<link>http://dissertations.umu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1579</link>
<description>Performance accountability, evaluation of performance by health care providers in Bugisu region
Muiri, Mupalya Gidale
There have been hostile press reports and comments from prominent political leaders about the &#13;
poor and unethical performance of health service providers and the system as a whole. This &#13;
prompted this study that set out to establish whether the health providers measured their &#13;
performance, and whether they accounted to the stakeholders, whether the stakeholders took &#13;
remedial action and if all that was done then what factors were influencing performance &#13;
accountability that it was not delivering the desired result. The study took place in three districts &#13;
of Bugisu region, purposively sampled and these were Bududa, Bulambuli and Mbale. Each &#13;
district was divided into geographical zones. From each zone a health centre (HC) II and a HC &#13;
III were sampled randomly using table of random numbers. The district Local Council V (LC V)&#13;
chairmen, secretary health and chairperson health committee were interviewed using a prepared &#13;
questionnaire, The same questionnaire was administered to the Chief Administrative Officers&#13;
(CAO), District Health Officers (DHO) and Assistant district health officers (ADHO).&#13;
For every randomly selected facility the corresponding Local Council (LC) III chairman, &#13;
secretary health and chairperson health committee were also interviewed. The same &#13;
questionnaire was administered to the facility in charge. A different questionnaire was &#13;
administered to two Health Unit management committee (HUMC) members that were not health &#13;
workers. A check list was also filled for each sampled facility. General hospitals and Health &#13;
centre IV were purposively sampled and a questionnaire administered to the in charge and senior &#13;
nursing officer, a check list was also administered.&#13;
The findings showed that there was performance accountability provided to stakeholders by the &#13;
service providers and the stakeholders read and understood the accountable and took action to &#13;
remedy the situation. However it was also established the failures arose because of inadequate &#13;
funding and inequitable resource allocation from the centre.
Katongole Simon Peter; Katongole Simon Peter
</description>
<dc:date>2014-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
